A Critique of Buddha Nature

Kenneth Leong
3 min readNov 4, 2024

Buddha Nature is a fundamental aspect of Mahayana Buddhism, positing that all sentient beings possess an inherent potential for enlightenment. While this notion is a source of hope and encouragement for spiritual development, a critical examination reveals significant shortcomings. Specifically, Buddha Nature tends to oversimplify human potential, contradicts key Buddhist teachings, and is rendered unnecessary by scientific insights into human behavior.

The Dual Nature of Humanity

First, while it is true that human beings have the potential to cultivate goodness, wisdom, and compassion, it is equally important to acknowledge our capacity for selfishness, destructiveness, and hatred. The notion of Buddha Nature tends to focus solely on the positive aspects of human potential, thereby neglecting the darker sides of our nature. This one-dimensional view risks creating an unrealistic expectation of human behavior and may lead to disillusionment when individuals fail to live up to the ideal of inherent goodness. Acknowledging the full spectrum of human behavior allows for a more nuanced understanding of our motivations and actions.

Contradictions with Anatta and Sunyata

Furthermore, the concept of Buddha Nature stands in tension with the Buddhist teaching of Anatta, or non-self. Anatta emphasizes that what we consider the…

--

--

Kenneth Leong
Kenneth Leong

Written by Kenneth Leong

Author, Zen teacher, scientific mystic, professor, photographer, philosopher, social commentator, socially engaged human

No responses yet