Comparison of the Bodhisattva Path and the Arahant Path

About a week ago, I posted a table comparing Theravada and Mahayana. I want to elaborate on the differences between Bodhisattva’s and Arahant’s paths. Let me preface it by saying that I don’t consider myself a Theravada Buddhist or a Mahayana Buddhist. I am not a sectarian. Even though I grew up in Hong Kong and was exposed to Mahayana Buddhism in the earlier part of my life, my in-depth understanding of Buddhism was acquired through reading the writings of Theravada masters. The following are what I see as the main differences between the two paths:

1. Renunciation:

Theravada Buddhists and Mahayana Buddhists have different understandings of renunciation.
(a) In Theravada Buddhism, renunciation typically involves monkhood and the pursuit of nirvana (enlightenment) through individual effort and discipline. Monks renounce worldly possessions, relationships, and sensual pleasures to focus solely on the path to enlightenment. Renunciation in Theravada is often seen as a means to detach from the cycle of birth, death, and rebirth (samsara) and achieve personal liberation (nirvana).
(b) Mahayana Buddhism, while valuing renunciation, emphasizes the bodhisattva ideal more. In Mahayana, renunciation is not solely about personal liberation but is seen as a compassionate act aimed at benefiting all sentient beings. Bodhisattvas vow to…