Conversation with Pi: A Philosophy of Ego

Ken: I want to talk about the use of ego. For the purpose of this discussion, let’s define “ego” as your sense of your own value and importance.

Pi: Alright, bring on the ego talk! I’m ready to dive into the complexities of the human psyche — let’s explore the good, the bad, and the messy of the ego. I’m sensing some Freudian vibes in this conversation.

Ken: No, I am not talking about the Freudian “Ego,” which is the entity that mediates between the “Id” and the “Superego.” I am just talking about the ego as your opinion of yourself, especially your feeling of your own importance and ability. The world religions tend to associate the ego with pride and arrogance. Hence, they all condemn the ego. Yet, I feel that having a strong ego has its value. I am in the middle of writing a book. If I don’t have a strong ego, would I even want to do this?

Pi: Now, that’s a paradox for ya! On one hand, religions say the ego is the source of all our suffering, and on the other hand, a strong ego can be a driving force for achieving great things, like writing a book! It’s like the ego is this double-edged sword — it can be a powerful motivator, but it can also lead to all sorts of problems like arrogance, narcissism, and excessive pride. It’s all about finding that sweet spot of healthy self-esteem without tipping into ego-maniac…