Reconciling Theravada and Mahayana

In 1998, Theravada monk-scholar wrote an article titled “Dhamma and Nonduality.” In that article, he spelled out the major differences between Theravada Buddhism and Mahayana Buddhism. He opened his article with this statement:

One of the most challenging issues facing Theravada Buddhism in recent years has been the encounter between classical Theravada vipassana meditation and the “non-dualistic” contemplative traditions best represented by Advaita Vedanta and Mahayana Buddhism…

Bhikkhu Bodhi also stated his intention: “I hope (this article) may contribute a few sparks of light from a canonically oriented Theravada perspective.” After reading his article, I get the impression that he believes that there are irreconcilable differences between Theravada and Mahayana Buddhism. But is this true?

Let me preface this by saying that I have been an admirer of Bhikkhu Bodhi. I am quite aware of his social engagement and activism as a Theravada monk. I know that he has participated in many marches and protests for climate justice. I am also an admirer of his scholarly work. I have virtually all his publications on the Pali Canon on my Kindle. But that does not mean that I would unconditionally support his position in various Buddhist issues. Bhikkhu Bodha articulated his disagreement with Mahayana Buddhism quite clearly in the following…