Right Speech May Include Annoying Speech

While the Buddha warned against clinging to views and opinions that may offend others, there are many instances where speaking up and advocating for certain views is essential — particularly in the realms of social justice and scientific progress. Although the principle of Right Speech aims to foster truth and harmony, in practice, it can sometimes provoke disagreement or irritation, especially when used to challenge entrenched beliefs or injustices. Thus, there is inherent conflict and tension within the ideal of Right Speech.

In the context of social justice, Right Speech often requires individuals to speak uncomfortable truths. Take, for example, gender equality. When women advocate for their rights, they challenge long-standing societal norms and practices that may make some people uncomfortable, especially those who benefit from the status quo. These calls for equality, whether made through speeches, protests, or public discussions, may provoke annoyance or defensiveness, but this discomfort is necessary for change. The same holds in conversations around race. Black individuals and communities fighting for racial justice confront deep-seated systemic racism. Their demands for justice, recognition of historical wrongs, and reparations may be met with resistance from those who feel threatened or uncomfortable by the confrontation of these issues. However, it is only…