Scientific Values and Buddhist Values

In my discussion with various people in Facebook groups, it has come to my attention that the general public lacks an understanding of scientific values. Worse, I have seen many unjustified prejudices against science, which are largely due to fallacious reasoning. There are many who think that science is essentially a neutral tool that does not have values of its own. In the following, I will state several commonly accepted scientific values. I will also compare them to Buddhist intellectual values. The following is a list of what I consider as the top scientific values:

1. Objectivity–Is a claim or opinion based on empirical facts, or is it based on an ideology or idea that is not supported by evidence?
2. Honesty–If one does not know something, does one admit one’s ignorance? If one’s knowledge is uncertain or incomplete, does one try to create an impression of certainty or completeness? If one’s data or methodology have limitations or flaws, does one communicate them to the public? Does one disclose potential conflicts of interest?
3. Openness–There are several potential meanings of openness. (a) Is one open to new ideas and alternative theories? (b) Is one transparent and not trying to hide certain facts from the public? (c ) Does one admit that one could be wrong, or does one consider oneself infallible and not open to valid…