Why Rebirth Consciousness is Bunk

The concept of “rebirth consciousness, often mentioned in the discussion of the twelve links of Dependent Origination, can be critiqued as inconsistent with the Buddha’s original teachings, particularly his doctrine of Anatta (non-self) and the Five Aggregates (pañca-khandha). Here’s the case against it:

1. The Five Aggregates Are Interdependent and Form a System

The Buddha taught that a being is constituted by the interdependent operation of the five aggregates: (1) form (rūpa), (2) sensation (vedanā), (3) perception (saññā), (4) mental formations (saṅkhāra), and (5) consciousness (viññāṇa). These aggregates arise in dependence on one another and lack inherent existence. In this framework, we should note the following: (a) Consciousness (viññāṇa) is not a free-standing entity but depends on form, sensation, perception, and mental formations. (b) Consciousness arises in dependence on conditions and ceases when those conditions are no longer present.

2. Rebirth Consciousness Contradicts Anatta

The notion of “rebirth consciousness” suggests a kind of autonomous “carrier” that survives the dissolution of the aggregates at death and continues into another existence. This idea is problematic because: (a) It implies an enduring essence or continuity of self, contradicting the teaching of Anatta, which denies the…